Ticker: AMZN
Date | Trade | Entry | Stop Loss | Exit | Percentage Profit | Days To Exit | |
14 Apr 16 | Buy | 30.9405 | 29.45 | 30.91 | -2.05% | 7 | |
11 May 16 | Buy | 35.3275 | 32.8 | 34.67 | -26.01% | 6 | |
29 Jul 16 | Buy | 38.25 | 36.62 | 38.31 | 3.68% | 13 | |
29 Aug 16 | Buy | 38.6 | 37.6 | 38.34 | -26.00% | 9 | |
25 Oct 16 | Buy | 42.015 | 40.155 | 39.1 | -156.72% | Stop loss was based on a recent low, stock gapped down | 4 |
13 Jan 17 | Buy | 40.8065 | 38.92 | 40.336 | -24.94% | Stock gapped down | 15 |
16 Feb 17 | Buy | 42.2405 | 41.14 | 42.04 | -18.22% | 6 | |
29 Mar 17 | Buy | 43.023 | 42.36 | 44.47 | 218.25% | 12 | |
9 May 17 | Buy | 47.64 | 46.39 | 49.78 | 171.20% | 23 | |
17 Jul 17 | Buy | 50.6275 | 48.46 | 50.607 | -0.95% | Stock gapped down | 10 |
6 Nov 17 | Buy | 55.834 | 52.53 | 57.05 | 36.80% | 20 | |
15 Dec 17 | Buy | 59.0965 | 57.85 | 58.47 | -50.26% | 5 | |
4 Jan 18 | Buy | 60.4745 | 58.03 | 69.05 | 350.81% | 22 | |
15 Feb 18 | Buy | 73.3445 | 63.3 | 74.32 | 9.71% | 10 | |
6 Mar 18 | Buy | 76.66 | 72.7505 | 77.7265 | 27.28% | 10 | |
18 Apr 18 | Buy | 75.7325 | 70.79 | 72.85 | -58.32% | 5 | |
24 May 18 | Buy | 78.7525 | 78.26 | 85.01 | 1270.56% | Stop loss was very close, hence the large percentage profit | 22 |
10 Jul 18 | Buy | 87.178 | 83.9 | 89.87 | 82.12% | 10 | |
3 Aug 18 | Buy | 92.028 | 88.5 | 93.87 | 52.21% | 9 | |
12 Sep 18 | Buy | 99.644 | 95.85 | 95.85 | -100.00% | 4 | |
26 Sep 18 | Buy | 98.9955 | 94.37 | 98.08 | -19.79% | 6 | |
17 Dec 18 | Sell | 78.3 | 85.95 | 74 | 56.21% | 9 | |
2 Apr 19 | Buy | 90.9835 | 87.28 | 91.26 | 7.47% | 10 | |
17 Apr 19 | Buy | 93.6885 | 91.26 | 94.9 | 49.89% | 11 | |
25 Sep 19 | Sell | 86.5775 | 91.63 | 87.39 | -16.08% | 15 | |
6 Jan 20 | Buy | 95.1005 | 89.97 | 93 | -40.94% | 7 | |
7 Apr 20 | Buy | 100.855 | 94.46 | 117.55 | 261.06% | 15 | |
1 Jun 20 | Buy | 122.318 | 116.5 | 122.21 | -1.86% | Stop loss was based on a recent low | 5 |
9 Jun 20 | Buy | 127 | 122.21 | 133.45 | 134.66% | 15 | |
1 Jul 20 | Buy | 138.982 | 133.45 | 150.62 | 210.38% | 9 | |
21 Jul 20 | Buy | 160.568 | 145.911 | 147.42 | -89.70% | 4 | |
24 Aug 20 | Buy | 166.5 | 155.07 | 169.32 | 24.67% | 9 | |
12 Oct 20 | Buy | 167.497 | 154.5 | 159.89 | -58.53% | Enter bar was a gap up | 5 |
17 Dec 20 | Buy | 162.85 | 153.64 | 158.63 | -45.82% | 11 | |
4 Mar 21 | Sell | 149.25 | 158.91 | 155.39 | -63.56% | 5 | |
22 Apr 22 | Sell | 147.089 | 157.37 | 114 | 321.85% | 17 | |
30 May 23 | Buy | 122 | 113.78 | 124.12 | 25.79% | 16 | |
23 Jun 23 | Buy | 130.83 | 124.12 | 127.26 | -53.20% | 11 | |
14 Jul 23 | Buy | 135.17 | 125.92 | 128.83 | -68.54% | Signal bar was a gap up | 6 |
14 Sep 23 | Buy | 145.48 | 136.75 | 138.64 | -78.35% | 4 | |
20 Nov 23 | Buy | 145.73 | 139.91 | 145.32 | -7.04% | 8 | |
14 Dec 23 | Buy | 149.96 | 143.13 | 152.71 | 40.26% | 11 |
Profitability
Today’s results is much better. Managed to catch a few good trends. Combined with yesterday’s results, the final balance for AMZN is $207,375.90, with a maximum drawdown of -17.20% (starting balance of $100,000, 5% risk per trade).
Honestly, I am a bit surprised by AMZN’s poor performance. Given that the stock is part of the Magnificent 7, I was expecting it to perform like NVDA. Instead, the stock was more choppy than I expected, moving in broad channels most of the time even when it trends.
Analysis
The trade with the largest profit (24 May 18) is due to a very tight stop loss. This is not a problem per se. Using a tight stop loss does lead to a very high reward to risk ratio, but does also increase the chance of a much higher loss if the trade is a loser. This has happened multiple times, where a trade with a tight stop loss was stopped out at a 100% loss. I guess there are always pros and cons regardless of what stop loss method you use.
However, I was reading the book “You can still make it in the market” by Nicholas Darvas and was surprised to find that his stop loss works a bit differently from what I remembered from my previous reading. Firstly, his initial stop loss is 10% below his purchase price. Secondly, he has a buffer of 5% below the bottom of his Darvas boxes for his trailing stop loss.
Currently, I use a stop loss that is inspired by what Darvas does. Here’s how my stop loss works:
For buy trades, if a stock’s low is not penetrated for the next three days, the stop loss is the low 3 days ago. Suppose the lows for 4 consecutive trading days are as follow:
Day | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Low | 10 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 10.9 |
The trailing stop for Day 3 will be 10.
Having articulated the rules so specifically, I realize there is a flaw with this stop loss. Given that I will know the low of Day 3 only after the day has ended, I can compute the trailing stop for Day 3 only after the close of the day. Hence, I can exit the position only on the next day, not on Day 3 itself. This means my exit will not be at $10, and may be higher or lower (likely lower). I believe this is known as a “Look forward” error, or something.
I believe this will not make a huge difference in most cases, but I still gotta alter my stop loss code.
In addition, Darvas has a 5% buffer for the bottom of his Darvas boxes. In other words, he did not exit a buy trade the moment it broke below the bottom of the box. He exited only if it broke more than 5% below the bottom. I should add this in to my stop loss too.
As mentioned in my previous post, I frequently got stopped out by a slight dip below the trailing stop loss, only for price to resume. Adding a 5% buffer may help.
What’s Next
I notice that Amazon is quite choppy on the daily chart. This made me wonder if I should use a weekly chart instead.
Also, how does adding a buffer to my stop loss affect results?
These are things that I want to explore next.
For now, I will re-code my trailing stop and practice trading AMZN on a weekly chart.
Leave a Reply